Friday, January 11, 2008

Optimal Results: Week 6

1. Joe 90.36(8-0) vs. 86.96(8-0) = [0]
2. Brad 80.80(7-1) vs. 77.12(7-1) = [0]
3. Kiah 77.50(6-2) vs. 54.76(3-5) = [+3]
4. Rob 74.56(5-3) vs. 65.48(6-2) = [-1]
5. Jon 65.84(4-4) vs. 56.12(4-4) = [0]
6. Bryan 62.34(3-5) vs. 44.92(1-7) = [+2]
7. Justin 61.52(2-6) vs. 57.50(5-3) = [-3]
8. Jerod 53.14(1-7) vs. 49.62(2-6) = [-1]
9. Abe 38.90(0-8) vs. 32.96(0-8) = [0]

Optimal Standings: Week 6
1. Justin 36-12
2. Brad 33-15
3. Joe 29-19
4. Kiah 27-21
5. Jon 26-22
6. Rob 21-27
7. Jerod 20-28
8. Abe 13-35
9. Bryan 11-37

Optimal Results: Week 5

1. Kiah 69.38(8-0) vs. 53.98(4-4) = [+4]
2. Justin 68.30(7-1) vs. 55.02(5-3) = [+2]
3. Abe 64.32(6-2) vs. 32.76(0-8) = [+6]
4. Jon 61.60(5-3) vs. 58.08(7-1) = [-2]
5. Bryan 60.60(4-4) vs. 33.64(1-7) = [+3]
6. Rob 58.40(3-5) vs. 58.40(8-0) = [-5]
7. Joe 56.34(2-6) vs. 56.14(6-2) = [-4]
8. Brad 47.70(1-7) vs. 42.62(3-5) = [-2]
9. Jerod 41.46(0-8) vs. 39.66(2-6) = [-2]

Optimal Standings: Week 5
1. Justin 34-6
2. Brad 26-14
3. Jon 22-18
T4. Joe 21-19
T4. Kiah 21-19
6. Jerod 19-21
7. Rob 16-24
8. Abe 13-27
9. Bryan 8-32

Optimal Results: Week 4

1. Brad 98.18(8-0) vs. 90.94(8-0) = [0]
2. Justin 63.02(7-1) vs. 55.66(6-2) = [+1]
3. Rob 59.08(6-2) vs. 59.08(7-1) = [-1]
4. Jerod 56.46(5-3) vs. 52.78(5-3) = [0]
5. Bryan 55.70(4-4) vs. 46.70(3-5) = [+1]
6. Jon 54.24(3-5) vs. 49.10(4-4) = [-1]
7. Joe 40.04(2-6) vs. 30.00(0-8) = [+2]
8. Abe 38.14(1-7) vs. 38.14(2-6) = [-1]
9. Kiah 36.60(0-8) vs. 36.40(1-7) = [-1]

Optimal Standings: Week 4
1. Justin 27-5
2. Brad 25-7
T3. Joe 19-13
T3. Jerod 19-13
5. Jon 17-15
T6. Kiah 13-19
T6. Rob 13-19
8. Abe 7-25
9. Bryan 4-28

Optimal Results: Week 3

1. Justin 92.98(8-0) vs. 85.62(8-0) = [0]
2. Brad 90.54(7-1) vs. 62.70(6-2) = [+1]
3. Jerod 85.86(6-2) vs. 71.74(7-1) = [-1]
4. Joe 76.38(5-3) vs. 53.42(4-4) = [+1]
5. Abe 74.16(4-4) vs. 54.50(5-3) = [-1]
6. Jon 68.40(3-5) vs. 33.08(1-7) = [+2]
7. Rob 62.90(2-6) vs. 51.58(3-5) = [-1]
8. Kiah 58.56(1-7) vs. 51.32(2-6) = [-1]
9. Bryan 55.16(0-8) vs. 30.50(0-8) = [0]

Optimal Standings: Week 3
1. Justin 20-4
T2. Joe 17-7
T2. Brad 17-7
T4. Jon 14-10
T4. Jerod 14-10
6. Kiah 13-11
7. Rob 7-17
8. Abe 6-18
9. Bryan 0-24

Optimal Results: Week 2

1. Brad 100.90(8-0) vs. 85.18(7-1) = [+1]
2. Jon 95.52(7-1) vs. 75.70(6-2) = [+1]
3. Kiah 95.22(6-2) vs. 88.70(8-0) = [-2]
4. Joe 87.00(5-3) vs. 73.16(5-3) = [0]
5. Justin 80.76(4-4) vs. 70.40(4-4) = [0]
6. Jerod 63.36(3-5) vs. 44.52(1-7) = [+2]
7. Rob 59.84(2-6) vs. 56.80(3-5) = [-1]
8. Abe 59.48(1-7) vs. 54.48(2-6) = [-1]
9. Bryan 53.38(0-8) vs. 28.64(0-8) = [0]

Optimal Standings: Week 2

T1. Justin 12-4
T1. Joe 12-4
T1. Kiah 12-4
4. Jon 11-5
5. Brad 10-6
6. Jerod 8-8
7. Rob 5-11
8. Abe 2-14
9. Bryan 0-16

Thursday, January 10, 2008

Optimal Results: Week 1

Okay so in the downtime between fantasy seasons, I thought it would be fun to look back at the past season and assume that we all were clairvoyant and knew who would give us our optimal scoring. I will post results for each week with the "optimal results" and the actual results. So here goes.

1. Justin 93.02(8-0) vs. 73.70(6-2) = [+2]
2. Joe 90.48(7-1) vs. 82.00(7-1) = [0]
3. Kiah 87.60(6-2) vs. 84.84(8-0) = [-2]
4. Jerod 76.04(5-3) vs. 55.00(3-5) = [+2]
5. Jon 69.52(4-4) vs. 59.30(4-4) = [0]
6. Rob 66.10(3-5) vs. 54.06(2-6) = [+1]
7. Brad 65.34(2-6) vs. 65.34(5-3) = [-3]
8. Abe 51.50(1-7) vs. 47.46(1-7) = [0]
9. Bryan 34.68(0-8) vs. 25.20(0-8) = [0]

Optimal Standings: Week 1
1. Justin 8-0
2. Joe 7-1
3. Kiah 6-2
4. Jerod 5-3
5. Jon 4-4
6. Rob 3-5
7. Brad 2-6
8. Abe 1-7
9. Bryan 0-8

Friday, January 4, 2008

Revolution

After a crazy year of decimal point scoring (with much success), I think it is time to start throwing around new revolutionary ideas. Not revolution for the sake of revolution, but revolution to follow the idea that we can alway improve our fantasy experience.

Negative Scoring? (I'm not a fan, but willing to entertain the thought)

New Free Agency System?

Changes to the auction?

New trade deadline?

Implementation of some sort of dynasty/keeper league?

Lets throw out ideas folks. We have plenty of time to think and debate.